Task 176: Narrative Plausibility Review

Status: DONE

Description

Beyond physics validation and cross-episode consistency, check whether computed values (durations, distances, conditions) match the viewer's experience of the story. If an analysis produces a result that feels inconsistent with on-screen depiction, flag this as a narrative plausibility concern and explore alternative interpretations.

Focus areas:

• Do computed travel times match the pacing shown on screen?
• Are the "ギリギリ" moments truly tight margins, or do the numbers tell a different story?
• Does the cold sleep constraint (no cold sleep unless explicitly depicted) create any timeline concerns?
• Are there any scenes where the G-forces implied by our calculations would be noticeable but aren't shown?

Dependencies

• All episode analyses complete
• Cross-episode consistency (Task 021)