Task 193: Post-IF Analysis Report Review

Status: DONE

Goal

Review episode reports after the counterfactual IF analysis additions (Tasks 190-192) and recent changes (MDX migration, error range visualization). Verify:

1. New IF explorations render correctly (ep01-exploration-05/06, ep03-exploration-04/05, ep04-exploration-04/05)
2. Cross-references and transferId links are valid
3. No rendering regressions from MDX migration
4. Build and all tests pass
5. Fix any issues found

Context

Since last review (Task 180), these changes happened:

• Task 185: Error range visualization added to EP01-EP03
• Task 186-187: All episodes migrated from JSON to MDX
• Task 188: Orbital animation example page
• Task 189: Tech overview refresh
• Task 190-192: IF analyses added to EP01, EP03, EP04

Findings

All 6 new IF explorations render correctly

• EP01: exploration-05 (perijove capture IF), exploration-06 (150h route IF)
• EP03: exploration-04 (wrong nav choice IF), exploration-05 (alternative moons IF)
• EP04: exploration-04 (plasmoid evasion cascade IF), exploration-05 (stay at Titania IF)
• All have proper headings, scenario tables, collapsed sections, KaTeX math, summary blocks

Bug found and fixed: scenario table column misalignment

• Issue: renderExploration() used only the first scenario's result keys for table headers, but each scenario's renderScenarioRow() output all its own keys as <td> cells. When scenarios had different keys, column counts mismatched.
• Affected: 12 explorations across all 5 episodes had inconsistent result keys
• Fix: Compute union of all result keys across all scenarios; render empty cells for missing keys
• Test: Added aligns columns when scenarios have different result keys regression test

Test results

• 1599 unit tests: ALL PASS (+1 new)
• 99 E2E tests: ALL PASS
• Build succeeds
• Rust checks pass